I have this NA Larch that needs the secondary branching completely rebuilt. I repotted this year so won’t be doing much. I know its a boring tree. I want the most traditional design with longest branches on bottom. I originally thought to reproduce the canonical proportion in the Naka book. Hey, if I can’t master the most basic traditional forms I won’t be able to execute expressive design with technique.
First question: What’s the right technique for cutting back to softer growth? Here’s a branch. I want to cut back to the red line. But the taper isnt great. It’s like going from 3/4cm to 1/4cm. I suppose its larch so it will thicken up pretty quick.
Even if I do cut it back and it heals, it’s pretty unlikely that I get backbuds on that long hardwood section (star). If I prune like in the excellent Mirai larch pruning series videos, I would be pruning at most down to the floret around circle. What can I do to promote secondaries along the hardwood sections?
Second question: This branch is the lowest. Ive been inspired by Ryan’s Larch Design video to bulk up with 4gauge and just go nuts. But even if I can correct the angle, I would still have to cut back to softer growth. This would be even worse than the first photo. imagine going from this 3/4in branch to try and cut and taper to one of these dinky 1/4cm things. I dont even know if its possible to develop taper into that situation. What do you advise for cutback technique in this situation?



